Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.
To Prepare:
Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you selected in Module 2 and the four systematic reviews (or other filtered high- level evidence) you selected in Module 3.
Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you selected in Module 2 and analyzed in Module 3.
Review and download the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template provided in the Resources.
The Assignment (Evidence-Based Project)
Part 3A: Critical Appraisal of Research
Conduct a critical appraisal of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected by completing the Evaluation Table within the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template. Choose a total of four peer- reviewed articles that you selected related to your clinical topic of interest in Module 2 and Module 3.
Note: You can choose any combination of articles from Modules 2 and 3 for your Critical Appraisal. For example, you may choose two unfiltered research articles from Module 2 and two filtered research articles (systematic reviews) from Module 3 or one article from Module 2 and three articles from Module 3. You can choose any combination of articles from the prior Module Assignments as long as both modules and types of studies are represented.
Part 3B: Critical Appraisal of Research
Based on your appraisal, in a 1-2-page critical appraisal, suggest a best practice that emerges from the research you reviewed. Briefly explain the best practice, justifying your proposal with APA citations of the research.
Articles
Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2023). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice (5th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.
Summary: Chapters 2 and 3 of this book provide comprehensive guidance on formulating compelling clinical questions and finding relevant evidence
Level of Evidence: This source represents a tertiary level of evidence, as it offers expert opinions and guidance based on the authors’ extensive experience and expertise in evidence-based practice.
Davies, K. S. (2011). Formulating the evidence-based practice question: A review of the frameworks for LIS professionals. Evidence-Based Library and Information Practice, 6(2), 75–80.
Summary: Davies’ article reviews frameworks for formulating evidence-based practice questions, providing insight into the process for professionals in library and information science (LIS
Level of Evidence: This article contributes to the primary level of evidence, as it reviews existing frameworks and synthesizes knowledge from multiple sources to inform practice.
Stillwell, S. B., Fineout-Overholt, E., Melnyk, B. M., & Williamson, K. M. (2010). Evidence-based practice, step by step: Asking the clinical question: A key step in evidence-based practice. American Journal of Nursing, 110(3), 58–61.
Summary: This article emphasizes the importance of formulating clear and answerable clinical questions as a fundamental step in evidence-based practice.
Level of Evidence: This article serves as a critically-appraised individual article (article synopsis), offering guidance on a key aspect of evidence-based practice, which is essential for conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Melnyk, B. M., Fineout-Overholt, E., Stillwell, S. B., & Williamson, K. M. (2009). Evidence-based practice: Step by step: Igniting a spirit of inquiry. American Journal of Nursing, 109(11), 49–52.
Summary: This article discusses the significance of fostering an inquisitive mindset and igniting a spirit of inquiry in evidence-based practice.
Level of Evidence: This article also serves as a critically appraised individual article (article synopsis), offering insights into the foundational principles of evidence-based practice, including the initiation of inquiry, which underpins systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.