Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.
Complete required readings (choose any 2 assigned readings and 2 assigned multimedia sources) In addition to the required readings, students will research on their own and post to the discussion board one article relevant to the topic discussed in the class from periodicals Washington Post, New York Times, Financial Times, or peer-review journals. 2 posts are required: 1 original post (at least 200 words), and 1 response to/comments (at least 100 words) on your classmates’ original post.
Buzan, Barry, Ole Wæver, and Jaap De Wilde. Security: a new framework for analysis. Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1998. Introduction. 1-21
Steve Walt, “The Renaissance of Security Studies,” International Studies Quarterly, 35(2), 1991, p.211-239
Multimedia
Barry Buzan – 1/5 – Security Concept
Dr. Barry Buzan discusses the concept of security.
View Time: 3:10 minutes
1) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dqdzRjSlz34
Barry Buzan – 3/5 – Objective View of Security?
View Time: 1:45 minutes
2) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WU4RjPJ4sAM
Barry Buzan – 4/5 – Defining Security Threats
View Time: 1:48 minutes
3) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eePKuBCJBXc
Human Security – A New Response to Complex Threats
This video was presented on the occasion of the High-Level Event on Human Security that took place on 8 May 2013 at UN Headquarters.
View Time: 5:08 minutes
1) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=axb0KkB2Le4
RESPONSE POST WILL BE TO THIS:
After reading “Security: a new framework for analysis”, a very comprehensive framework was presented in reference to analyzing security that goes beyond traditional military aspects. The authors propose a broader definition of security, encompassing political, economic, societal, and environmental dimensions. They introduce the concept of “sectors” and argue that security issues should be examined across various sectors to understand the complexity of contemporary security challenges. The framework encourages a more inclusive and multidimensional approach to security studies, reflecting the interconnected nature of global issues. Overall, the work contributes to a reevaluation of how scholars and policymakers conceptualize and analyze security in the modern world.
I then read “Ontological security in world politics: state identity and the security dilemma”, which explores the concept of ontological security in the realm of international relations. Mitzen argues that states not only pursue physical security but also seek ontological security, which involves the assurance of their identity and existence. The article investigates how state identity plays a crucial role in influencing the traditional security dilemma. Mitzen suggests that states may adopt strategies to maintain their identity, even if it means making compromises on conventional security concerns. In essence, the article contributes to a deeper understanding of how identity considerations shape state behavior and responses to security challenges in the global political arena.
The first multimedia I chose was Human Security – A New Response to Complex Threats. This video highlights the multifaceted challenges faced in the contemporary world, including threats such as drought, flood, conflict, disease, hunger, climate change, and financial crises. It emphasizes the concept of human security, aiming for people to be free from want, free from fear, and free to live in dignity. The message underscores the importance of addressing various dimensions of security, not only in terms of traditional conflicts but also encompassing broader aspects such as economic well-being, health, and environmental sustainability.
The second multimedia was Barry Buzan – 4/5 – Defining Security Threats. In the video, Buzan discusses the importance of studying how issues are designated as security concerns. It highlights the authority and role of state leadership in defining security matters but notes that acceptance of these designations is not automatic. The example of the Vietnam War and more recent events like the situation in Iraq illustrates that such designations can be highly contested and may eventually collapse if not widely accepted. Buzan finds the current war on terrorism particularly interesting, as it appears to be a macro-securitization similar to the Cold War, defining a large strategic domain over an extended period. The success of this designation is acknowledged, especially in gaining agreement among Western states, contrasting it with the significant disagreement over the situation in Iraq.
The article I chose was https://www.jstor.org/stable/26627193 – “Categorizing Security for Security Management and Information Resource Management”. The text discusses the challenges in categorizing security due to fragmented and divergent taxonomies. It highlights the lack of consensus on the definition of security and the various dimensions associated with it. The authors propose a tetra-facet model of security, consisting of Subject/Scope, Object, Source of Insecurity, and Method. They suggest using facet analysis to build a comprehensive taxonomy of security, combining different facets to categorize security terms for various user groups. The study makes contributions by developing the tetra-facet model, proposing a method for taxonomy construction, and providing prototype taxonomy snippets for managing information resources about security. The authors emphasize the need for further study on security methods and the evaluation of the comprehensive taxonomy by experts and users.
Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.