Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.
BY DAY 6 OF WEEK 7
Respond to at least two colleagues on two different days in one or more of the following ways:
Compare your selected articles with respect to differences in study design.
Discuss differences or similarities in the media coverage of your selected studies.
Expand on a colleague’s posting with additional insight and resources.
Make a suggestion or comment that guides or facilitates the discussion.
Remember to include information from the Learning Resources as appropriate.
colleague post 1Understanding the Link between Sleep Patterns and Cognitive Decline in Older Adults
The mass media article posted in NEWSMEDICAL LIFE SCIENCES by Paharia (2023) examines a peer-reviewed article published in JAMA Network Open by (Keil et al., 2023). The study by (Keil et al. (2023) explores the association between sleep patterns and cognitive impairment among older adults based on data from the Seattle Longitudinal Study (SLS).
Analyzing Epidemiological Concepts
Sleep patterns, cognitive impairment, and associated risk factors are addressed by the epidemiological concepts presented in articles by Paharia (2023) and (Keil et al., 2023). The study design includes a comprehensive longitudinal analysis of SLS data from 1997 to 2020 involving the use of epidemiological measures such as hazard ratios (HRs) and Cox proportional regression modeling to understand how sleep parameters relate to cognitive decline. Important concepts such as amyloid deposition, cognitive decline precedents, and targeting pathogenic mechanisms early in disease progression are appropriately emphasized in the mass media article written by Paharia (2023).
Oversimplification and Lack of Depth
However, some aspects of the research by Keil et al. (2023) have been oversimplified by Paharia (2023). While the article by Paharia (2023) mentions the relationship between sleep disturbance and dementia, it does not explain how sleep metrics could be complex or its link with cognitive outcomes. Besides, detailed statistical methods employed in the peer-reviewed study should be included; otherwise, this leaves some gaps concerning what was studied leading to a possible lack of understanding by readers (Keil et al., 2023).
Representation and Critique
In assessing the representation of research findings, Paharia (2023) is effective at communicating key findings: short sleep duration and higher variability in sleep patterns are associated with memory problems in old age. However, the article by Paharia (2023) lacks the depth provided in the peer-reviewed article by Keil et al. (2023), potentially leading to misconceptions or oversights. Epiemenologists criticizing the study may point out that it fails to provide specific detailed statistical nuances and caution against interpreting the results without a thorough understanding of the study methodology.
Patient Interpretation and Recommendations
Consequently, when interpreting this mass media article for a patient, I will highlight that irregular sleep patterns, notably shorter sleep duration and increased variability, are associated with a higher risk of cognitive decline (Garbarino et al., 2021). It is important to note that correlations do not establish causation, and hence this study is purely observational (Hamaker et al., 2020). Furthermore, the significance of considering individual differences, lifestyle factors, as well as non-captured confounders must be emphasized in the media. Thus, healthcare practitioners should encourage further research and referral for personalized advice on sleep and brain function to promote a nuanced perception.
Conclusion
The mass media article effectively communicates the study’s core findings but oversimplifies complex aspects. The critical analysis underscores the importance of accurately conveying epidemiological nuances to the public. Bridging scientific research with public understanding calls for an exhaustive account of methodological intricacies. Therefore, attaining an informed understanding helps dispel misinformation about the interrelationships between sleep patterns and cognitive decline among older adults.
colleague post 2EPIDEMIOLOGICAL STUDY DESIGNS IN THE MEDIA
Briefly summarize the study you found, and then include the citations for both the mass media and the peer-reviewed articles.
The study I found is by Sule et al. (2023), and the article was published by Mathur (2023). The study focuses on physicians’ communication of COVID-19 misinformation on social media. The authors illustrate that physicians were responsible for propagating COVID-19 misinformation through social platforms, which contributed to widespread inaccurate and potentially harmful information. According to the study, false and inaccurate health information exists, but social media has increased reach and speed of dissemination. The study further established that more than 50 US physicians participated in communicating false information, including propagating that vaccines were ineffective or unsafe, masks and social distancing did not reduce the risk of spreading the virus, and that the medications for prevention were not effective despite having been FDA verified. The intention of spreading this information was found to be profitable, where these physicians would charge more to prescribe drugs such as ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine to COVID-19 patients (Mathur, 2023).
Explain what epidemiological concepts are included in the mass media article.
The mass media used a descriiptive design where the author summarized the findings of the peer-reviewed article. The criteria of association are between physicians and COVID-19 misinformation, where the media article suggests that the false information reached more people and was taken as true because the physicians spreading the malicious infodemic belonged to organizations that were vocal during the pandemic. The study has no reference groups, which minimizes the potential for bias. Both the media and peer-reviewed articles covered the same ideas, but the ideas are detailed in the peer-reviewed article. The article by Sule et al. (2023) provides more information, including precise methods of data collection and analysis, and attention is given to potential confounding factors such as area of speciality.
Give your assessment of how well the mass media article represented the actual research that was conducted.
The media article appropriately reflected the findings of the peer-reviewed article. The article further highlighted the consequences of physicians spreading misinformation, such as increased professional, public health and ethical concerns. However, the media article omitted some information, including the methods used to collect and analyze data, and failed to explain the results and inferences made from the study findings thoroughly.
Explain how you would respond to or interpret the article for the patient.
If a patient seeks my opinion, I will respond that the media article is accurate in its link between physicians and the spread of COVID-19 miscommunication. However, I would inform them that the article contains limited information and proceed to refer them to the peer-reviewed article for more information and clarity in decision-making. The patient should also conduct a background check to identify legitimate sources of COVID-19 information.
original questionPost a response to the following:
Briefly summarize the study you found, and then include the citations for both the mass media and the peer-reviewed articles.
Explain what epidemiological concepts are included in the mass media article (e.g., measures of association, study design, confounders, and bias) and how they compare to those in the peer-reviewed article.
Give your assessment of how well the mass media article represented the actual research that was conducted. Describe any obvious omissions from the mass media article that epidemiologists critiquing the study would need to know.
Finally, imagine that a patient brings this mass media article to you and asks you for your informed opinion. Explain how you would respond or interpret the article for the patient.
NB
THIS IS A RESPONSE TO POST
YOU ARE RESPONDING TO TWO SEPARATE POST
EACH RESPONSE MUST HAVE A SEPARATE REFERENCE PAGE
EACH REFERENCE PAGE MUST BE IN APA
MUST HAVE AT LEAST 2 REFERENCE
REFERENCE MUST BE LESS THAN 5 YEARS
MUST ACKNOWLEDGE WRITER WITH MORE SUPPORTIVE QUESTIONS AND ADDITIONAL MATERIAL
Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.