Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.
Asking for a rebuttal to an argumentative essay (attached below) the rebuttal is to an argumentative piece stating how scientific fraud is not more problematic than bias. Specifically, I would appreciate it if you could argue that although bias is a subtle issue, the scientific community has developed robust tools and methodologies to detect and mitigate it effectively. Additionally, it would be impactful if you could explore how fraud, unlike bias, can be systemic, often perpetuated by industries or institutions for financial or ideological gains, therefore, representing a widespread challenge that can distort scientific understanding and influence public policy. As well as, the global impacts of high-profile cases of fraud that have led to public health crises or significant scientific retractions, highlighting the immediate and destructive effects compared to the more subtle and long-term effects of bias. You are not expected to make a full case for the other side, but to question and critise the validity of the orginal arguments
Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.