Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.
Submit your peer-reviewed and newly revised final draft of your argumentative research essay here. Make sure that you have the following:
4-6 pages in MLA format (see template Download template)
3-4 peer-reviewed, scholarly articles or sources from the Valencia library databases
works cited page in MLA format
submit your peer reviews (from your classmates), reflection, and your final draft in four separate files.
Refer to the peer review sheet and rubric for the grading criteria. Here is another example Download exampleof an MLA-formatted research paper.
You must submit either a Word (.doc or .docx) or an Adobe Acrobat (.pdf) document. No .rtf or .pages or Google docs, please.
The due date for credit: Sunday @ 11:59 PM
NO late papers will be accepted for this final paper. Please ensure that you have time prior to the deadline for successful submission. You may refer to the syllabus policy where it states:
″Students are encouraged to complete this major assignment before the posted deadline as late submissions of the research and the final exam are not permitted unless the student can provide proof that meets the excused- absence/missing assignment criteria set by the college.″
PLEASE REVIEW RUBRIC:
Argumentative/Research Essay Rubric (1)
Criteria Ratings Pts
Ideas and Content
50 pts
EXCELLENT
Balanced presentation of relevant and legitimate information that clearly supports a central purpose and shows a thoughtful in-depth analysis of a significant topic and synthesis of sources. Multiple perspectives on the issue are addressed, beyond a “pro/con” analysis. Analysis (commentary) deconstructs evidence and establishes valid and thoughtful conclusions or interpretations.
36.67 pts
PROFICIENT
Information presented connects clearly to a central purpose and shows attention to at least two divergent perspectives. Commentary interprets the evidence, but perhaps shows superficial analysis about the topic.
25 pts
DEVELOPING
Information provides reasonable support for a central purpose and displays evidence of a basic analysis of a significant topic; the paper may lean toward exposition or argument
11.67 pts
Basic
Information supports a central purpose or argument at times. Analysis is basic or general or the paper is generally expository or overly argumentative. Ideas may be overly redundant.
/ 50 pts
Integration of Research
50 pts
EXCELLENT
Quotes are integrated smoothly, set up appropriately (not dropped) and explained clearly. Research is mature, complex, and academic. Research is synthesized into the paper fluidly. Decisions to paraphrase or use direct quotes are based on a clear awareness of what gives the research its power. At least six in-text citations from a minimum of three sources were used.
36.67 pts
PROFICIENT
Quotes are integrated smoothly, set up appropriately (not dropped) and explained clearly. Use of direct quotes and paraphrasing is generally appropriate without excessive reliance on direct quotes. At least six in-text citations from a minimum of three sources were used.
25 pts
DEVELOPING
Quotes are regularly integrated, but a couple may not be set up or explained clearly. Writer uses outside sources but they may not be fluidly synthesized into the writing. At least five in-text citations from a minimum of two sources were used.
11.67 pts
Basic
Quotes are regularly integrated into text, but there may be an overdependence on direct quotes, quotes that could have been paraphrased, or are otherwise not needed. Research may be somewhat shallow and focuses primarily on facts, not ideas. At least four in-text citations from a minimum of two sources used, but there may be a great over-reliance on one source.
/ 50 pts
Organization
40 pts
EXCELLENT
The ideas are arranged logically to support the purpose or argument. They flow smoothly from one to another and are clearly linked to each other. The reader can follow the line of reasoning easily, and transitions guide the reader through the topic clearly.
30 pts
PROFICIENT
The ideas are arranged logically to support the central purpose or argument. They are usually clearly linked to each other. For the most part, the reader can follow the line of reasoning. Regular use of transitions between main ideas.
20 pts
DEVELOPING
In general, the writing is arranged logically, although occasionally ideas fail to make sense together. The reader is fairly clear about what writer intends. Lacking transitions usually to connect ideas.
10 pts
Basic
The writing is not logically organized, but it shows some attempt. Frequently, ideas fail to make sense together. The reader cannot identify a line of reasoning and loses interest
/ 40 pts
Style (Diction, Fluency and Voice)
20 pts
EXCELLENT
The sentences are rhythmic and graceful. The writing flows naturally and shows a mastery of varied sentence structures for intended purpose. The language is rich, natural, and yet succinct. Words are specific, precise, and appropriate. Writing is academic in tone, without being cold. Writing is very engaging.
14 pts
PROFICIENT
he writing has a natural flow and rhythm. Varied sentence structure and length demonstrate conscious planning. Word choice is mature, appropriate for the task. The language is functional, and conveys the message of the paper clearly.
8 pts
DEVELOPING
The writing moves mechanically. The writer shows control over simple sentence structure, but uses complex sentences infrequently. Language is predictable and/or repetitious. Word choice is at times not appropriate for the task. Expression is clear but clichés and redundancy may exist
4 pts
Basic
The writing moves awkwardly. The sentences tend to be choppy, incomplete, or rambling. The sentence rhythm is clumsy and jarring. Word choice is limited, monotonous, and/or misused. The language is awkward and unclear. The writer uses a limited vocabulary and/or excessive jargon. Tone is unprofessional or too informal.
/ 20 pts
Conventions
20 pts
EXCELLENT
No errors in punctuation, capitalization and spelling. No errors sentence structure and word usage. All cited works, both on Works Cited and in the text are flawless as is MLA formatting. Text at least 1,000 words. Parenthetical documentation is perfect.
14 pts
PROFICIENT
Almost no errors in punctuation, capitalization and spelling. Almost no errors sentence structure and word usage. Almost all cited works, both on Works Cited and in the text. Text is at least 1,000 words. Parenthetical documentation is nearly flawless
8 pts
DEVELOPING
Several errors in punctuation, capitalization and spelling. Several errors sentence structure and word usage. Several errors on cited works, both on Works Cited and in the text. Text is at least 1,000 words. Parenthetical documentation has several errors.
4 pts
Basic
Consistent errors in punctuation, capitalization and spelling. Consistent errors sentence structure and word usage. Consistent errors on cited works, both on Works Cited and in the text. Many errors in parenthetical documentation. Text is less than 1,000 words
/ 20 pts
Peer Reviews
view longer desсrіption
20 pts
Full Marks
The student submitted two complete feedback evaluations forms along with their final draft.
10 pts
Missing Some Criteria
The student only submitted one completed peer feedback form with the final draft.
0 pts
No Marks
No peer reviews were completed/submitted with the final draft.
/ 20 pts
Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.