Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.
What are your thoughts as you enter into your first clinical experience? Think about the following questions:
What skills do you currently have that you believe will be helpful?
What fears do you have regarding seeing psychiatric patients?
What support do you have to help you be successful in your clinical course?
How can the clinical faculty support you in this clinical course?
Submission Instructions:
Your initial post should be a 5-7 minute video. Your initial post is worth 8 points.How do I upload media files in my Canvas Studio account?Links to an external site.
How do I embed Canvas Studio media in a discussion reply in Canvas as a student?Links to an external site.
You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points (1 point per response.)
All replies must be in video format, constructive, and use literature where possible.
Please post your initial response by 11:59 PM ET Thursday, and comment on the posts of two classmates by 11:59 PM ET Sunday.
You can expect feedback from the instructor within 48 to 72 hours from the Sunday due date.
Grading Rubric
Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric, which is located by clicking on the 3 dots in the upper right-hand corner and selecting “Show Rubric” in the menu.Video Discussion Rubric
Video Discussion Rubric
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentification of Main Issues, Problems and Concepts
3 ptsDistinguished
Post substantively accurate. Identifies and demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the issues, problems, and concepts surrounding the assignment. Provides exceptional and thought-provoking analysis that directly addresses details and/or examples of the main topic.
2 ptsExcellent
Post is mostly related to the topic. Demonstrates understanding of most of the issues, problems, and concepts surrounding the assignment. It provides some supporting details and/or examples. Analyses not as clear as they could be.
1 ptsFair
Demonstrates limited understanding of most of the issues, problems, and concepts surrounding the assignment. No details and/or examples are given.
0 ptsPoor
Post is off-topic, incorrect and/or irrelevant to the issues, problems, and concepts surrounding the assignment. Analyses are not well organized or clear.
3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeVocal Qualities and Appearance
3 ptsDistinguished
Well-spoken, professional, and clearly organized. Speaks in English with a strong voice and clear pronunciation with no grammar issues. Strong, upbeat, delivery with a vocal inflection that engages the audience throughout; very professional. Little to no fillers. The speaker is relaxed, confident, dressed in their lab coat with their ID, and prepared.
2 ptsExcellent
Average oral presentation delivery and logically organized. Speaks in English with minor pronunciation issues and grammatical errors. Vocal inflection is strong throughout, engages the audience, and is professional. Little to no fillers. The speaker is relaxed, confident, dressed in their lab coat with their ID, and prepared.
1 ptsFair
Casual oral presentation delivery that is sometimes unclear with some errors in pronunciation and grammar. Speaks in English, but is difficult to understand. Vocal inflection is not strong throughout, does not engage audience, and is too casual at times. There are numerous pauses and fillers. The speaker is not relaxed, confidence is lacking, they are not dressed in their lab coat, and/or are not prepared.
0 ptsPoor
Poor oral presentation delivery. The speaker is inaudible or pronunciation is so poor they cannot be understood. Multiple grammar errors create confusion. Vocal inflection is poor and does not engage the audience. Pauses and fillers make it difficult to follow the speech. The speaker is not dressed appropriately and lacks in confidence and preparation.
3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAbility to Reference Course Materials Verbally
2 ptsDistinguished
Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of verbal references.
1.5 ptsExcellent
Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of verbal referencing.
1 ptsFair
Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of verbal referencing.
0 ptsPoor
Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Unacceptable use of verbal referencing.
2 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResponse to Peers
2 ptsDistinguished
Constructively responded to two other posts and either extended, expanded, or provided a rebuttal to each.
1 ptsExcellent/Fair
Constructively responded to one other post and either extended, expanded, or provided a rebuttal.
0 ptsPoor
Provided no response to a peer’s post.
2 pts
Total Points: 10
Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.