Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.
Below you will find three questions/prompts. However, you will also find a link to a Google doc which contains an answer to each question. The answers have been generated by Artificial Intelligence (AI). Your task is to “grade”/critique each answer that AI generated andimprove upon it. I want you to critique each response and say what you dislike about each answer or how the answer is insufficient in some way. You will also need to say how you would improve each answer. These improvements should include specific references to the module material and to the articles found in the modules. Since AI usually does not answer with any specificity, one of your tasks is to say what you would add to each answer to make it better.
Please see the video below where I explain this in more detail and give examples of what I am looking for.
QUESTIONS:
1.) The Founding Fathers clearly designed Congress to have a lot of power and were obviously concerned about the president gaining too much power. They set up a government where power was shared and divided amongst the three branches of government, in part to make sure no one person gained too much power. Do you believe that Congress should have more power over our government than the president and do you think that the Congress ACTUALLY has more power than the president (please make specific references to the articles of the Constitution)? Think about what is going on now in our government and does it seem like Congress or the President has more political power?
Click here (https://docs.google.com/document/d/1etlQhENQgrH19azjJNzvPq2KfZ3TEAVzvyUj4ZQPqCo/edit?usp=sharing) to read the AI-generated answer that you will be critiquing.
2.) On a previous page you were asked to read this article (https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2022/01/08/scalia-was-right-make-amending-the-constitution-easier-526780). What were the author’s main arguments about Constitutional amendments? Please make specificreferences to the arguments presented in the article. Additionally, do you agree with the author’s arguments or not AND do you think these changes the author is talking about would improve our political system? Why or why not? Please explain your answer and be specific in your answer.
Click here (https://docs.google.com/document/d/13Twd_r2Fx9R-nHbLpiANovDgCc6utqhUq9r_Md4qPEQ/edit?usp=sharing) to find the AI-generated answer you will be critiquing.
3.) The Electoral College was established to prevent the people (the masses) from directly electing the president. The thought was that the people were not capable of making decisions that important and that they might make some bad decisions due to their lack of knowledge and education. Is there any legitimacy to the idea that the masses should not have too much political power? Should there be any limits to who can vote, or in which elections the masses can vote in? In your answer, consider whether it is dangerous or not to allow people who have no knowledge about the political system to decide who should be the ones in charge. You should
also make reference to the
philosophers
we studied earlier and what they might say about these questions. Make sure to
explain
your answer.
Click here (https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Azug4QqvuOqLkGXOW1seqkygm9GFL-0jk00kFmUumi4/edit?usp=sharing)
to find the AI-generated answer you will be critiquing.
You do not need to write this is an essay-style format. You can simply number each response #1-3.
Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.