Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.
3. Guidance and Requirements:
a. Develop an analytical essay to appraise and compare the seven principles of mission command to the Operation Anaconda Case Study, March 2002 and relate them to one or more of the objectives listed in paragraph 4. Use your time to develop a deep understanding of your topic to fully explain your analysis. Use details/analysis from the Case Study to support your main ideas.
b. Construct the essay IAW the American Psychological Association (APA) Writing Style. Your essay should include four major sections: a Title page, an Abstract which is an in-depth introduction of your topic, main body consisting of 3 full pages and no more than 5 pages, and a reference page with at least two sources for the bibliography.
c. Your essay will be typed, double-spaced on standard-sized paper (8.5″ x 11″) with 1″ margins on all sides. Use 12 pt. Times New Roman font.
d. To create a page header/running head, insert page numbers flush right. Then type “TITLE OF YOUR PAPER” in the header flush left using all capital letters. The running head is a shortened version of your paper’s title and cannot exceed 50 characters including spacing and punctuation.
e. Your cover page title format will be as follows 1.) Title of your paper, 2.) Last name, First name, 3.) NCO Academy 42A SLC 00xx-22
4. Objective. The student will choose to relate one or more of the following objectives to the seven mission command principles and use the details/analysis from the Operation Anaconda Case Study to support their ideas.
a. Objective 1: Assess the implications of Operation Anaconda for command structures for future joint expeditionary operations and tactical battles.
b. Objective 2: Examine the challenge of generating accurate intelligence estimates of enemy forces, intentions, and capabilities for tactical battles.
c. Objective 3: Analyze the implications of Operation Anaconda for the capacity of
predetermined battle plans to forecast how events will actually unfold.
d. Objective 4: Assess the roles that can be played by allied coalition forces in battles such as Anaconda.
e. Objective 5: Discuss why the forging of adaptive plans, supported by effective forces, is important to preparing for battles such as Anaconda.
f. Objective 6: Evaluate Anaconda’s lessons for dispersed operations with light infantry forces in the Information Age.
g. Objective 7: Examine the role of SOF forces in modern battles such as Anaconda.
h. Objective 8: Analyze the lessons of Anaconda for air-ground interaction and CAS efforts in battles.
i. Objective 9: Assess Anaconda’s lessons for the role played by modern information networks in battles.
j. Objective 10: Examine the lessons of Anaconda for creating adaptable forces during defense transformation
Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.