Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.
In anticipation of this assignment, take a look at the PowerPoint (“The Research Question”) and its accompanying video. I’d like you to spend some time researching your subject and devising a strong, specific, and arguable research question.
When you’ve got a great research question, I’d like you to answer the following questions.
1. Please provide your ORIGINAL working research question. (Make sure that it’s the most specific and arguable version of the question that you can muster. This should be one or two sentences long.)
2. Visit https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt Links to an external site.. Select “Try ChatGPT” and ask the generator: “What are some possible positions a person might take in response to the following question: [INSERT YOUR ORIGINAL RESEARCH QUESTION HERE]? Please copy and paste ChatGPT’s responses and submit to me. (NOTE: This is the only approved use of ChatGPT in this assignment. See below for an example.)
3. Select two of the positions generated by ChatGPT and corroborate them by finding sources on the Internet that echo them. Please provide links to these two sources (articles, YouTube videos, podcasts, blog posts, etc.) and make sure that they represent two differing views on this subject. How exactly do these sources differ? Where might they overlap in their arguments?
4. Who do you envision as the audience for this project? Who might benefit from having this question answered? Who might be interested in learning more about it? (No more than 250 words.)
5. Thou shalt not bore thy reader. All I do is grade, grade, grade. Quite frankly, I don’t want to read another essay — so why should I care about this problem you’ve identified? How does it affect me? If it doesn’t, how might it concern someone I love? (No more than 250 words.)
6. Are you proposing this subject in “good faith”? Are you committed to finding useful solutions and proposing constructive change?
***Note that these word counts say no more than 250 words; however, that’s not an invitation to submit a quick sentence and be done with it. Be as thorough as you can. You don’t want to leave your reader with questions. Aside from #2, please write in your own ORIGINAL words.
When you’re done, please submit your responses here and they will be graded.
*****
Here is a sample of what happened when I used ChatGPT to pose a potential research question.
In anticipation of this assignment, take a look at the PowerPoint (“The Research Question”) and its accompanying video. I’d like you to spend some time researching your subject and devising a strong, specific, and arguable research question. (If you’re stuck for an idea, you might consider looking at MCC’s LibGuides — lots of interesting topics are represented there.)
When you’ve got a great research question, I’d like you to answer the following:
1. Please provide your ORIGINAL working research question. (Make sure that it’s the most specific and arguable version of the question that you can muster. This should be one or two sentences long.)
2. Visit https://openai.com/blog/chatgptLinks to an external site.. Select “Try ChatGPT” and ask the generator: “What are some possible positions a person might take in response to the following question: [INSERT YOUR ORIGINAL RESEARCH QUESTION HERE]? Please copy and paste ChatGPT’s responses and submit to me. (NOTE: This is the only approved use of ChatGPT in this assignment. See below for an example.)
3. Select two of the positions generated by ChatGPT and corroborate them by finding sources on the Internet that echo them. Please provide links to these two sources (articles, YouTube videos, podcasts, blog posts, etc.) and make sure that they represent two differing views on this subject. How exactly do these sources differ? Where might they overlap in their arguments?
4. Who do you envision as the audience for this project? Who might benefit from having this question answered? Who might be interested in learning more about it? (No more than 250 words.)
5. Thou shalt not bore thy reader. All I do is grade, grade, grade. Quite frankly, I don’t want to read another essay — so why should I care about this problem you’ve identified? How does it affect me? If it doesn’t, how might it concern someone I love? (No more than 250 words.)
6. Are you proposing this subject in “good faith”? Are you committed to finding useful solutions and proposing constructive change?
***Note that these word counts say no more than 250 words; however, that’s not an invitation to submit a quick sentence and be done with it. Be as thorough as you can. You don’t want to leave me with questions.
When you’re done, please submit your responses here and they will be graded.
*****
Here is a sample of what happened when I used ChatGPT to pose a potential research question.
Prof. Dademo: “What are some possible positions someone might take in response to the following question: “Is monogamy useful in the 21st century?”
ChatGPT: The question of whether monogamy is useful in the 21st century elicits a range of opinions, influenced by cultural, personal, ethical, and practical considerations. Here are some possible positions that someone might take in response to this question:
Support for Monogamy:
Stability and Commitment: Advocates of monogamy argue that it provides a stable and committed foundation for relationships, fostering trust, intimacy, and emotional security.
Parenting and Family: They believe monogamous relationships are advantageous for raising children, as they provide a stable and structured environment conducive to child-rearing.
Prevention of STIs: Some argue that monogamy can reduce the risk of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) when both partners are faithful to one another.
Monogamy as a Personal Choice:
Respect for Personal Values: Some individuals view monogamy as a personal choice and respect others’ decisions to embrace it as a meaningful expression of their values and preferences.
Compatibility: They argue that monogamy works well for some people who find it compatible with their emotional and romantic needs.
Monogamy with Open Communication:
Open and Honest Communication: Supporters of this position emphasize that successful monogamous relationships require open and honest communication about desires, expectations, and boundaries.
Adaptability: They contend that monogamy can adapt to changing circumstances by accommodating discussions about non-monogamous options if both partners are willing.
Critique of Monogamy, Not Its Usefulness:
Relationship Quality: Some individuals may not question the usefulness of monogamy but rather the way it’s practiced in some cases. They argue that issues like possessiveness and jealousy are not inherent to monogamy itself but rather arise from unhealthy relationship dynamics.
Advocacy for Alternatives:
Exploration of Non-Monogamy: Advocates for this position believe that alternative relationship structures like polyamory or open relationships can offer more flexibility and meet the diverse needs of individuals in the 21st century.
Freedom and Autonomy: They argue that these relationship models prioritize individual freedom and autonomy, allowing people to build relationships that align with their personal desires and values.
Individualism and Choice:
Emphasis on Individual Choice: Some individuals emphasize the importance of personal choice and autonomy in deciding the nature of one’s relationships.
Variety of Relationship Styles: They argue that the 21st century should embrace a variety of relationship styles, allowing people to choose what works best for them.
Critique of Monogamy as Outdated:
Challenging Tradition: Critics argue that traditional monogamy may not align with the evolving values, gender roles, and expectations of individuals in the 21st century.
Possessiveness and Jealousy: They contend that exclusivity in monogamous relationships can lead to possessiveness, jealousy, and emotional challenges.
Monogamy as a Cultural Norm:
Cultural Norms and Expectations: Some individuals acknowledge that monogamy remains a cultural norm and may be practiced due to societal expectations and traditions, even if it doesn’t fully align with their personal preferences.
Flexibility in Definitions of Monogamy:
Expanding Definitions: Advocates for this position argue that monogamy itself can be flexible and redefined to accommodate changing societal and personal values. It doesn’t have to be synonymous with lifelong exclusivity.
These positions reflect the diversity of perspectives on the usefulness of monogamy in the 21st century. Individuals may take different stances based on their own experiences, beliefs, and understanding of relationships in today’s society.
Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.