For this assignment, you will prepare a  4-page review of the literature pertine

Need help with assignments?

Our qualified writers can create original, plagiarism-free papers in any format you choose (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, etc.)

Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.

Click Here To Order Now

For this assignment, you will prepare a  4-page review of the literature pertinent to a selected problem for healthcare research and to use that review to propose a methodology to address the problem.
Conduct a search of literature relevant to the problem/topic. Identify a minimum of 4 references, most of which are peer-reviewed articles. Only one opinion articles may be included.
Read the peer-reviewed articles with the focus of preparing a document that will compare and contrast the information in the articles you found. Copies of the articles used must be submitted with the final paper.
The reader of your literature review should be able to clearly identify the gaps in the knowledge in the problem area as well as the purpose of the study you are proposing. The number of pages in this assignment should be no longer than 4 pages. You should be able to write enough to create an effective argument but not so much that the result looks padded. 
Prepare an Evidence Matrix using the template located in Module 2: Lecture Materials & Resources. EXAMPLE OF EVIDENCE MATRIX 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FxzhIn4tDac 
The introduction is original work and logically organized.
The paper is no more 4 pages in length and follows current APA format including citation of references.
Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work.
Journal articles and books should be referenced according to the current APA style (the library has a copy of the APA Manual).
RUBRIC BELOW 
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentification of Main Issues/Problems
4 pts
Distinguished
Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues/problems.
3 pts
Excellent
Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues/problems.
2 pts
Fair
Identifies and demonstrate an an acceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.
1 pts
Poor
Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.
4 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis and Evaluation of Issues/Probelms
4 pts
Distinguished
Presents an insightful, thorough analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.
3 pts
Excellent
Presents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most of the issues/problems.
2 pts
Fair
Presents a superficial or incomplete analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.
1 pts
Poor
Presents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.
4 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates a Conceptual Understanding
4 pts
Distinguished
Provides a thorough, competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a high level of conceptual understanding.
3 pts
Excellent
Provides a competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a moderate level of conceptual understanding.
2 pts
Fair
Provides a competent responses to all issues/problems, but lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.
1 pts
Poor
Provides an unacceptable response to all issues/problems, and lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.
4 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse of Citations to Course Readings and Additional Research/Literature
4 pts
Distinguished
Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing.
3 pts
Excellent
Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.
2 pts
Fair
Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.
1 pts
Poor
Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing.
4 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines
4 pts
Full Marks
Demonstrate a high level of clarity, precision, and attention to detail. APA style is correct and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors.
3 pts
Excellent
Demonstrate a high level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.
2 pts
Fair
Demonstrate a moderate level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.
1 pts
Poor
Demonstrates issues in writing and communicating clearly. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention.
4 pts
Total Points: 20

Need help with assignments?

Our qualified writers can create original, plagiarism-free papers in any format you choose (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, etc.)

Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.

Click Here To Order Now